|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:25:07 GMT -5
Post by Brenden (NYR) on Jul 9, 2013 16:25:07 GMT -5
To PIT: 2013 5th round selection 2013 6th round selection
To NYR: 2013 5th round selection (OTC)
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:29:14 GMT -5
Post by Ian (Pit) on Jul 9, 2013 16:29:14 GMT -5
Pit confirms.
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:39:55 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Steven (TOR) on Jul 9, 2013 16:39:55 GMT -5
When did we chance to rounds 6-10 can be traded??
I was away for the weekend so I might have missed it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:41:54 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 16:41:54 GMT -5
did you get a PM titled
My last MASS PM - trumps the previous MASS PMs...
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:42:13 GMT -5
Post by David (NJD) on Jul 9, 2013 16:42:13 GMT -5
Haha yeah ditto what TOR said
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:44:03 GMT -5
Post by David (NJD) on Jul 9, 2013 16:44:03 GMT -5
I thought that meant rounds 1-5. I actually perfer no trading of 6-10 will make those rounds go faster.
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:47:36 GMT -5
via mobile
Post by Steven (TOR) on Jul 9, 2013 16:47:36 GMT -5
did you get a PM titled My last MASS PM - trumps the previous MASS PMs... Didn't understand it in that way Only understood that as 1-5 like what everyone was told before
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 16:49:50 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2013 16:49:50 GMT -5
i assume it was meant to be understood as written
|
|
|
NYR/PIT
Jul 9, 2013 17:19:13 GMT -5
Post by Ian (Pit) on Jul 9, 2013 17:19:13 GMT -5
Yet again, Edm is right. There were other trading matters such as teams who came into the draft with 10 picks were not permitted to trade because the main objective was to ensure, at all cost -at least in my mind that people would walk away with 30 prospects. Teams short on picks, like me, we're going to either have to trade for more picks or fill out rosters after the draft to get to 30. Teams with more picks could only make 10 selections and would have to forfeit extra picks - a contingent among us arose with a valid argument which stated that a GM should be able to do as they wish with their picks - TOR, you were one of them. I put thought to the basics of it and felt it made sense and the aforementioned had a higher failure rate to making this draft a success t. Typically, the latter is all that it should have been. Sometimes when you commish you hear a lot of voices and it drives you to try and please everyone, and that is how the earlier drafting strategy reached its madness. All in all, I sent out the last email informing everyone that they can do as they see fit with their picks.
|
|