|
Post by Steve (Mtl) on Sept 6, 2011 1:47:06 GMT -5
NYI receives Patrick Sharp Peter Holland
LAK receives Frans Nielsen P.A. Parenteau Zack Kassian NYI 1st pick 2012
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2011 1:47:31 GMT -5
Islanders accept.
|
|
|
Post by Steven (TOR) on Sept 6, 2011 11:41:29 GMT -5
I though you couldn't trade 2011 picks. At leas that's what the ruled said
|
|
|
Post by David (NJD) on Sept 6, 2011 11:48:16 GMT -5
I though you couldn't trade 2011 picks. At leas that's what the ruled said yeah good catch! totally didnt even notice it said 2011. also sorry with all the trades and such i dont know who has how many players but your getting 2 nhl players for 1 is that putting you over the 25nhl players
|
|
|
Post by David (NJD) on Sept 6, 2011 11:52:13 GMT -5
also this is not posted in yahoo yet, and i see LAK dropped stillman. this should be part of the trade. or atleast posted that you are dropping him someplace not just in yahoo. this is how players get lost in the mix.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2011 11:56:33 GMT -5
You know this is a pending trade right? Worst comes to worst he selects somebody I want and we wait until it's okay to process it. And ya he cut Stillman, what person would think he did it randomly the day he made a trade? On another note Zach Kassian is a 2011 pick.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2011 11:57:01 GMT -5
And ya it is posted on Yahoo. The message boards sometimes glitch, and even then, it'd be in your email.
|
|
|
Post by David (NJD) on Sept 6, 2011 11:59:05 GMT -5
You know this is a pending trade right? Worst comes to worst he selects somebody I want and we wait until it's okay to process it. And ya he cut Stillman, what person would think he did it randomly the day he made a trade? On another note Zach Kassian is a 2011 pick. yeah just saw it inyahoo. had to look at my team to see the pending deal. will make apost about that in a min. as for the trading of the pick.. iknnow its technically a pending deal but all the deals we have done already are official as players have been traded from those deals and LAK already made a trade block looking to move sharp as he is HIS player nnot a pending trade.
|
|
|
Post by Ian (Pit) on Sept 6, 2011 12:37:15 GMT -5
Correct. A 2011 pick will not work. LAK, we'll need a definie on what "future considerations" by 48hrs after the completion of the prospect draft for this trade to go through.
|
|
|
Post by Steve (Mtl) on Sept 6, 2011 12:39:10 GMT -5
Correct. A 2011 pick will not work. LAK, we'll need a definie on what "future considerations" by 48hrs after the completion of the prospect draft for this trade to go through. Roger that
|
|
|
Post by David (NJD) on Sept 6, 2011 12:43:36 GMT -5
wow that i dont like at all. future considerations is way worse. this can be all over the place. and you say 48hrs after the completion of the draft. what happens during the regular season if someone uses future considerations. can i have a year to make that announcememnt or is it 24hrs.. i think those terms make trading very messy and can get very confusing to figure out and keep track of.
|
|
|
Post by Ian (Pit) on Sept 6, 2011 13:10:37 GMT -5
We'll give some leeway for now, meaning LAK has up until the 48hr window (after the conclusion of the prospect draft) to make this trade right; otherwise, it doesn't go through. Outside of this, we're not doing "future considerations." However, in this particular case, it can only mean a player TBD from his Pro or Prospect roster and or a future pick(s).
|
|
|
Post by Steve (Mtl) on Sept 6, 2011 13:21:39 GMT -5
Thank you... In this case it will be settled in the next day (assuming the draft moves along quickly enough) Not really a fan of future considerations either, but again, in this case everyone kinda knows already what it's gonna be... It was a bandaid term...
|
|
|
Post by Ian (Pit) on Sept 6, 2011 13:41:13 GMT -5
Thank you... In this case it will be settled in the next day (assuming the draft moves along quickly enough) Not really a fan of future considerations either, but again, in this case everyone kinda knows already what it's gonna be... It was a bandaid term... Yeah, no problem. I figured that it was a term synonymous with TBD.
|
|